<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The homepage sets the tone.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinovator.com/web/design/set-the-tone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinovator.com/web/design/set-the-tone/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Web &#38; Interactive Firm Inovat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.theinovator.com/web/design/set-the-tone/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinovator.com/?p=244#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Thanks for the feedback. However, the point that I believe Jared is trying to make is different than the point I am trying to make. 

He is against designing websites consistently regardless of the end user (i.e. a website for plumber should navigate the same as a website for a law firm), and I would also be against that. 

What I am implying is that when you define your navigation on the homepage, make sure it stays the same throughout the entirety of the website. Just like the Avis.com example, they didn&#039;t just change the design of one form on the website, they did it to all the forms on the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. However, the point that I believe Jared is trying to make is different than the point I am trying to make. </p>
<p>He is against designing websites consistently regardless of the end user (i.e. a website for plumber should navigate the same as a website for a law firm), and I would also be against that. </p>
<p>What I am implying is that when you define your navigation on the homepage, make sure it stays the same throughout the entirety of the website. Just like the Avis.com example, they didn&#8217;t just change the design of one form on the website, they did it to all the forms on the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hamill</title>
		<link>http://www.theinovator.com/web/design/set-the-tone/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hamill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinovator.com/?p=244#comment-6</guid>
		<description>This notion has recently been disputed by Jared Spool. I tend to agree with him.

http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/09/15/consistency-in-design-is-the-wrong-approach/

A lot of people don&#039;t actually learn the site at all. They see the options and choose one. On the next page they do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This notion has recently been disputed by Jared Spool. I tend to agree with him.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/09/15/consistency-in-design-is-the-wrong-approach/" rel="nofollow">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/09/15/consistency-in-design-is-the-wrong-approach/</a></p>
<p>A lot of people don&#8217;t actually learn the site at all. They see the options and choose one. On the next page they do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

